Dear Sibichen,
Wishing you a very happy
birthday!
Congratulations for your journey
through the road less travelled. I read ‘Tomorrow is my birthday’ which you wrote two years back and ‘Today is my birthday’, you wrote last year. But already a few days have passed since
your birthday, and still you have not posted anything like that this year. Don’t
lose your way! You are on the right track. Follow the calling.
You are now confused! Whom you
should listen: the freewill or conscience?
Freewill and conscience need not
necessarily be in two distant realms where there is no mutual reproach or
approach. I know your question: Whether
freewill should be subjected to the dictates of the conscience? Can the
conscience issue prescriptions and proscriptions subject to the cultural and
structural predispositions, if not biological and emotional predispositions?
Freewill cannot be assumed to be a licence to act in response to the cathectic interests.
Similarly, even when the inclination to act in a particular manner is guided by
cognitive stimulants, it would not be necessarily justified. Thus there is an
inherent dissonance between freewill triggered action and reaction and
conscience triggered response.
Human, being the superior
creation, has been given the power
to act according to his freewill, of course within the parameters and
boundaries set by immediate kith and kin, social networking circles, and the
state. But it is a fact that there are enough areas in one’s life where none of
these boundaries put up any restrictions or obstructions. Your thought
processes are totally out of bounds for any external regulation, convention,
norms, mores, or proscriptions. May be you would argue that ultimately action
and behaviour would definitely be characterized by the above thought process and
there could be restrictions at that level. It may also be argued that the
thought processes triggered by freewill rather than conscience, very subtly
influences the outward actions, though the true nature and dimensions of such
action may not be very apparent to others. But the truth is that, the intention
and character can be very obvious to others, may be almost immediately to those
who are more intimate and to others if they are exposed to the person for a
fairly long time. I don’t say that this situation is always an embarrassment.
It can be an embarrassment only when the freewill and the conscience are
positioned at rigidly and mutually exclusive realms without being complementary
and supplementary to each other.
By this, I don’t mean that
conscience is superior to freewill or vice versa. This depends on
what your conscience constitutes. Is your conscience characterised by intangible traits built on you where you hardly have any control? Or is it characterized by the early childhood experiences? Here also, I should say you rarely had any serious involvement, though I won’t judge that you were immature, because I strongly feel that even when you were a few months old, you were sufficiently mature and adequately responsible for your behaviour and responses.
what your conscience constitutes. Is your conscience characterised by intangible traits built on you where you hardly have any control? Or is it characterized by the early childhood experiences? Here also, I should say you rarely had any serious involvement, though I won’t judge that you were immature, because I strongly feel that even when you were a few months old, you were sufficiently mature and adequately responsible for your behaviour and responses.
Your conscience also has been
influenced by the voluntary and involuntary learning process and experiences
you were subjected, mostly when you were 18 or 19. The conscience continuously
evolve and the evolution was substantially complete by age 19, while you
completed the second year of the chemistry degree. All subsequent experiences
were only made incremental influences to the conscience. Thus let me tell you
that all your further academic adventures at post graduate and higher levels in
the areas of sociology, economics, research, public finance, management, public
policy, technology, corporate governance and law have had very negligible
influence on your thought process and behaviour which were triggered by conscience
rather than freewill.
However, in contrast, your
freewill had much more significant influence in the twenties and the thirties. Undoubtedly,
all those formal and informal learning processes and experiences have a definite
bearing on the freewill and the patterns its manifestations shown in inner convictions and everyday
responses.
This does not mean that
conscience was static since the age of 19. Though freewill is a dynamic entity
constantly in the process of updating, amending, reinforcing, and unlearning,
the items in the repository of conscience get strengthened by drawing on these
learning and experiences. Thus, most often the innate and early age convictions
proved to be justified and vindicated. Therefore, I feel that your conscience
though apparently conventional, conservative and more or less static, holds and
claims to hold a superior vision within
you.
This position may not mean that
all your academic ventures are misadventures. But these qualifications have not
created any concrete value addition to your personality and have had no bearing
on the way you respond, react, retreat or retract in varied circumstances. On
the contrary, the formal learning processes and the consequent
institutionalized outcomes have contributed only pains and not pleasures in
your life. You tend to become intolerable and get confused over the real life
happenings and when you get exposed to apparently contrasting attitudes, views,
and behavioural patterns of people and institutions around you. And you tend to
hear, ‘Relax..Relax..’. This is, in fact, a universal phenomenon. There is an
inevitable tension associated to formal learning.
You tend to brag that the formal
learning process has indeed deflated your ego. Is that really right? Has the intolerance,
on the contrary, inflated the ego or if it put rudely, the pride? All these
formal knowledge lapels are just window dressing and may be suited for a
society that judges and markets such artificial achievements.
What is that makes you lose your
temper? Is it really coming out of your intolerance to actions and attitudes
you feel contrary to your actions, beliefs and convictions? Or is it an
unhealthy response emanating out of your own selfish and weak thought processes
and consequent behavioural pattern? Anger cannot be justified either way. Anger
can produce only harm all around.
Increased tolerance to people and
their ideas, opinions, attitudes, and action, does not mean that you need to be
always in a race to please people. You need not participate in a popularity
contest. It is quite an achievement if you succeed in getting the regard and
admiration of people. But that need not be by showcasing a behavioural style
that pleases others. By taking calculated attempts to indulge in conversations
that are soothing to others or that are aimed at entertaining them, you seem to
hold that you are rendering a productive service. This emanates from a mistaken
impression that all people you come into contact like conversations that make
them laugh or that which give them information about others that they would
love to hear. One category of such conversations in common parlance is called gossip. You indulge in such conversations where
others are subjects, where there is no net value addition to anyone, just to
maintain your status in a virtual social network or to strengthen an actual
relationship structure in face-to-face real life situations. There is no creative
contribution to your overall wellbeing!
Updates, inputs and forwards in
the social networking platforms are many times repetitive, irrelevant,
artificial, orchestrated and thoughtless and there need to be optimum time
devoted to such effortless interaction.
You know very well that it is
foolish to go with the flow, though enjoyable, comfortable, and carefree. Do
you need to be a Roman in Rome? Even when the most talented, most privileged,
and the most resourceful people move ahead in such seemingly successful,
innovative and enterprising activity, that does not mean that you need not
think twice before following their path. Here your conscience concretized by
the age of 19 will be a handy tool to evaluate the option rather than the
intellectual, emotional and social responses substantiated by your freewill
continuously shaped over the last several years.
You are not caught yourself in an
inescapable den along with several wide mouthed lions pampering and luring you
to carnal enjoyment. It is quite a miracle to come out of the age old
obsessions and you proved that it is not impossible if there is a will that
disregards the so called freewill. I don’t deny the fact there is a strong
genetic predisposition to think and act in a particular way. But I don’t think
you are inescapably prone to fall into such deep overcrowded pits where people
chill out. ‘Why not! If it gives me so much fun and excitement?’ They shout!! ‘If
you abstain from such indulgences, you will be called as a boring creature.’
You talked about the aspiration
to become a world class citizen. Where have you reached in that journey? Don’t
you think the word ‘world’ in ‘World class citizen’ is a misnomer? What is the
real ‘world’?
Now, what is your road map ahead? How do you gain
strength to swim against the wave? Why you are so confused at times and think
that such a journey would make you less popular? You are clear by now that
there is no inherent tension between freewill and conscience. The journey is
indeed tough. But as you progress, the dissonance will definitely reduce and
there would be greater peace, happiness and sense of achievement. But you still
have not mustered the confidence to declare to yourself that there will never
be any U-turn? Also, still you are scared to advocate the truth you discovered
to many others. I understand your inclination to continue not to be
overconfident (may be because of your fear). But your pessimistic expression
gives an impression that you are on a shaky ground because of poor convictions.
If you are guided by truth and faith, I do not think you should be scared to
share what you are convinced about and have
experienced. Such unsure positions would not facilitate reaching your goals
and I would warn you about the self-fulfilment prophecy. You know that you
can’t do anything without the Spirit. So why not pass on your burden to those
hands. Take the yoke which is easy and light.
May you become richer this year, with
gifts of wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and the
right fear.
With love,
Sibichen
Very nicely put up... A letter to uplift Life. Liked it. thanks for sharing
ReplyDeleteI've seen people put to test by God to reward them with unshakeable faith and trust in Him. But it is rare to see a person undergoing self retrospection in the fire of truth, before his fellow-men and exposing his inner conflicts and fear. Hats off to your brave soul and your brave path! The Bible says, "Perfect love casts out all fear" and it defines perfect love as God Himself. May this year be a constant walk with God and His love, so that you will bring us some happy news about your journey through the path you chose..God bless! Sindhu
ReplyDeleteSeems like a very honest letter , st from heart ! May all your dreams come true and you get what your heart truly desires ... Ans ATB for the contest as well
ReplyDeleteToo good, I love the idea itself.
ReplyDeleteenjoyed reading your letter Sir
ReplyDeleteSir, how the above post lost in the race/selection of your TOP -10 blogs of 2012 ? Question worth self-introspecting ? The letter written on your birthday's eve is : SELF OBSERVATION, SELF EXAMINATION & SELF REFLECTION' all rolled into one. Your letter reminds me of Aristotle's quotes 'KNOW THYSELF' and ' THE UN-EXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING' Lewis Carol wrote in Alice in the Wonderland: 'Who in the world am I ?...Ah that is a great puzzle" Sir, you have attempted to crack your own code with 100% non-biased mindset . C.G. Jung stated 'Your visions will become clear only when can look into your own heart.: WHO LOOKS OUTSIDE DREAMS, WHO LOOKS INSIDE AWAKES' ..........The letter is a VALUE ADDITION ADVICE, to yourself on your own road map to become 'World Class citizen' . .....sir, on many unsolved issues that are haunting/bothering you I quote Rainer Maria Rilke's quote ' Have patience with everything that remains unsolved in your heart....live in the question'
ReplyDeleteHow one can reexamine life and to know what we are capable of doing ? How a common persons can introspect ? It is not an easy task for them..Be the guide to perplexed how one can go about it . .....your post will have the potential to examine the way one views their own behavior to bring out the change you (the social scientist ) desire !!!
ReplyDelete