Many of you would agree with me
on this. The more you are willing, the more load you are dumped with. This is a
common grievance from many of those sincere workers in any organization. Bosses
prefer such donkeys who won’t grumble when more work is put on them. Some
bosses would have the audacity to say that, ‘I hope you enjoy doing this’.
By being a favourite of the boss,
don’t think they will get any special privileges as compared to those who shirk
work. Not at all! The hardworking persons who do not object to any additional
workload are denied leave even for emergency reasons. Bosses make them indispensable
in work and they would feel insecure themselves when these hardworking persons
are away from work even for a few hours.
Shyam’s petty boss
Read one of the bitter
experiences of a sincere person. Shyam was a middle level manager. He was very enterprising and systematic. He
always exceeded his targets. His boss depended on him to realize the overall
target. Shyam used to come very early to office and sat late hours to complete
the work. Even on holidays he voluntarily went to office to help his boss in
clearing the pending tasks. One day, he had to leave urgently on a Friday
afternoon to visit his family who was staying in his native place. The next day
was a family ceremony on the occasion of the birth of his son. Since the bus
would leave his hometown around 3.30 pm, he took permission and left the office
at 2 pm to occupy the seat from the originating station. But when he came back
on Monday, the Administrative Officer of the section handed over him a noting
of the boss on the file. He had written, ‘Since the officer had left before 2
pm, ask him to apply for half day leave’. The officer was in a shock. He had
plenty of leaves at his credit. That was not an issue. What worried him was the
attitude of his boss. He recalled how many late hours he had worked in that office
in the past several months? How many weekends he had come to office
to help out the boss to clear the pending workload of the entire office? Why
should his boss be so petty and wrote such a remark on the file?
The above incident is a classic
example of how intelligent donkeys are exploited by their bosses. However, in
due course, this trend has taught lessons to those who are sincere and
hardworking but shrewd, not to demonstrate their potential before exploitative bosses.
When they were asked to do a job, they would plead ignorance even when they
were experts in that. They knew that where there is a will there is a load.
Only way they could express their unwillingness was by pleading ignorance.
Ultimately the organization is the loser.
The free-riders and
loafers
In an exploitative environment
led by inefficient bosses, really intelligent people fail to contribute their
best fearing excessive extraction of their time and energy. Had the boss been
efficient, he would have ensured that everyone in the team is properly equipped
equitably to contribute their best in the most optimum manner possible. This is
not to deny the fact that there would be people of differing capability and
potential in an organization. Both the
practices viz. putting the entire load on the willing team members or allowing
the unwilling team members to continue in their laziness are hallmarks of
inefficient and easy going bosses. They want to get the results with minimum
efforts, even if it was at the cost of burdening a handful of sincere, obedient
and loyal team members.
Organizations in government and
in the public sector are notorious for a ‘behavioural pattern’ that results in
continuous loading of work on sincere employees. This is because there is
nothing they can do in respect of the free riders, loafers and the inefficient
lot that constitute major workforce. These organizations can neither reduce
their pay nor send them out due to the archaic, impractical and unfair job
contracts. Ultimately the sufferers are those who are committed to update their
skills and contribute their best for the bosses and the organization. For some
of them it is not just commitment, but certain values such as respect, loyalty
and obedience that are ingrained in their personality that make them work. They
keep working irrespective of their bosses in spite of various personal and
familial inconveniences. In fact, many government organizations engaged in the
public service still get going, though not as efficient as some of the private
sector organizations, only because of a handful of sincere souls at various
levels.
Though equitable work allocation
is unrealistic in any organization due to disparities in expertise, potential
for innovation, and aptitude, there need to be proper distribution of workload
at every level. Even in new generation organizations where there are scientific
screening and allocation of work at entry level, same get diluted at subsequent
levels. In a competitive and fast business environment, organizations need to
depend on those who deliver quickly and efficiently. They also take care to
compensate them for their extra efforts. But, in terms of overall and enduring
productivity for the organization, one should bear in mind the fact that monetary
incentives alone would not necessarily provide much needed motivation.
Ultimately, faced with health hazards, family expectations and relationship
strains, the executives would not enjoy even challenging tasks and
opportunities given to them. Many would leave the organizations just to escape
from the exploitative bosses.
What is the solution? Don’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg
The bosses need to understand
that there are wiser donkeys around them. If they throw their loads in
frustration, there would not be anyone to pick up those loads, since the bosses
have not prepared a standby team. They should bear this in mind: Utilize the
sincere ones; but don’t squeeze them. At the same time, if there are more
loafers and free-riders, that shows how inefficient the boss is. A true leader
is the one who creates meaningful tasks in an environment where people would
compete to shoulder the responsibilities assigned.
Equitable allocation of workload,
distribution of meaningful tasks as per interest and potential and realistic
targets at every level would result in organizational well-being. Putting
excessive strain on the willing team members would not contribute to enduring
overall productivity of the organization and of the concerned individuals. Don’t
kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Organizations need them at challenging times.
The employees need to understand
that pleading ignorance to an exploitative boss is not a solution. That would
make them not only unwanted but also unutilized which would harm their
creativity. They need to be receptive to the extent the organization needs and
also to the extent they can demonstrate their potential. Remember,
opportunities are gateways to great accomplishments.
© Views are personal. Share your views and comments. Post by
clicking ‘comments’ below (it will appear after a while). Or email your
experiences to sibi5555 (gmail).
Very interesting, helpful and true insight.
ReplyDeletenow that a new pay commission is announced , they could think of some mandatory ordering on efficiency of workforce.say the least efficient 5% could be sent out periodically on transparent scale.nobody will be able to escape a strict review as one cannot say that there is no least efficient fellow! an organisatio that doesnt punish inefficiency cannot deliver.
ReplyDeletek madhavan nair
Sir, the point which Sibichen sir, is highlighting is how the efficiency of workforce is aggravated by the force of bosses and how a section of free riders and loafers is created by indifference of the bosses . Bosses need to change: riders and loafers need to learn. It is not a just a simple question of firing workforce alone ignoring the other side of the coin.
DeleteYes, one should examine why there are so many free-riders? There are certain public sector companies that spent more than 50 % of the salaries to 70% of its employees who do not contribute substantially to the productivity. Has anyone thought of motivating them through adequate training? There should be a political and bureaucratic will to 'fire' the loafers.
DeleteEfficient Private organizations have a different problem. The continuous sniping of inefficient people away makes the teams full of competent people. But still HR forces bell curve. So even if bosses don't force, people have to compete against each other to stay ahead of the pack. When everyone is of high intelligence, one can only compete on time. Organization benefits by the compensation but employees burn out. And companies are fine with this because they have a continuous supply engine going from freshers in college to top position. So naturally people will burn out and drop off while those who survive move to the next level till they reach a position where it becomes too hard to cope and they have to drop off.
ReplyDeleteWhen the sole aim of the companies are to make profits (of course, that is justified), they consider employees just cogs in their system. As far as steady supply is ensured, they are happy. In countries like India, there is not shortage for fresh blood.
DeleteFew would have the audacity to write this post. You have said it--there way too many people who force others to make up for their own inefficiency. The importance of balancing work and life is crucial for maintaining continue personal and professional health. We forget that we spent most of our daylight hours in offices and sometimes our precious sleep times at work. Long back I read this book where the author spoke of the need of workplaces to become nurseries of human growth. Today I am reminded of it again. Great post! Totally loved it!
ReplyDelete